Both editors misinterpret “This supreme science was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession….”,

whereas Srila Prabhupadsa clearly writes: ” This science of the relationship with the Supreme was thus received through the chain of disciplic succession..”

Srila Prabhupada very clearly defines what science He is talking about i.e. “the science of the relationship with the Supreme…”, whereas one person’s “supreme science”, as per editors, may be another’s neglected / rejected science in the relative world.

Such digressions are NOT acceptable and need consequently to be rejected out right!!!

The Bhagavad Gita where such illegal changes occur over and over again, as is the case here, is a bogus, non-parampara Bhagavad Gita. It is to be rejected.

To wilfully, shameless and whimsically change the message of the Acarya is a criminal undertaking and consequently law suit may follow in due course.

We are in the very early stage of building our case. So far roughly 115 texts have been examined out of a total of 700, that’s about 16 %.

We want to hear and repeat Srila Prabhupada’s original version not the speculating editor’s falsities and fantasies!

There are plenty of such instances throughout the text.

We are not follower of rascal editor Hayagriva

Neither are we follower of rascal editor Jayadvaita

Please top misleading the world into an unknown and unwanted direction.

We are follower of Srila Prabhupada, the Founder-Acarya of ISKCON, the founder of the Bhaktivedanta Book Trust or BBT and the founder of the Back to Godhead magazine and writer of some 80 first class books on self realisation.

Both editors are obstacles on the path and they may be removed to gain direct access to Srila Prabhupada, our leader and Guru.

WE WANT PRABHUPADA VANI !!!

We dont want Hayagriva Vani and be cheated

Neither do we want Jayadvaita Vani and be cheated again.

WE WANT SRILA PRABHUPADA VANI As It Is. FULL STOP!