Srila Prabhupada’s personal verdict on Jayadvaita, BGAII OT, 10.15, purport, first paragraph: Therefore, the Supreme Personality of Godhead can be known by persons who are in confidence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead by discharging devotional service and the example is Arjuna and his followers. Persons of demoniac mentality or atheistic mentality cannot know Krishna, and simply mental speculation to detract the readers from the Supreme Personality of Godhead is a serious type of sinful activity. One who does not know Krishna should not try to comment on the Bhagavad-gita. Bhagavad-gita is the statement of Krishna and it is the science of Krishna. It should be understood from Krishna as Arjuna understood, not from any atheistic persons.

Of course, Jayadvaita, true to his character, has plagiarized and falsified the statement as follows BGAII V2 10.15 purport:

The Supreme Lord, Krsna, can be known by persons who are in a relationship with Him through the discharge of devotional service, like Arjuna and his followers. Persons of demonic or atheistic mentality cannot know Krsna. Mental speculation that leads one away from the Supreme Lord is a serious sin, and one who does not know Krsna should not try to comment on Bhagavad-gita. Bhagavad-gita is the statement of Krsna, and since it is the science of Krsna, it should be understood from Krsna as Arjuna understood it. It should not be received from atheistic persons.

He has falsified the statement as follows:

1) He replaced “in confidence” with “in a relationship.” That cheapens and falsifies the matter. A relationship may not necessarily be confidential. Srila Prabhupada gives the example of a bank. Only a few persons such as the manager and the accountant may know the most confidential dealings of the bank. The clerk and the customer although being in a relationship with the bank will have absolutely no clue about the most confidential dealings of the bank.

2) He paraphrases the following sentence when there is absolutely no need for it. That is an insult to Guru. In his relationship with Guru, Jayadvaita is ageist, racist and suffers from an American superiority delusion.

and simply mental speculation to detract the readers from the Supreme Personality of Godhead is a serious type of sinful activity.

3) Same as number two for :”It should be understood from Krishna as Arjuna understood, not from any atheistic person” Jayadvaita cannot control his mind and thinks his mental verbiage is superior to the Guruvani.

Therefore Srila Prabhupada verdict on Jayadvaita is:” and simply mental speculation to detract the readers from the Supreme Personality of Godhead is a serious type of sinful activity. ” Another adjective to his repertoire: the seriously sinful Jayadvaita.