Both you editors Hayagriva and Jayadvaita and supporters are so very much puffed up for removing first class language from Prabhupada ‘s Bhagavad-gita As It Is and replacing it with your personal and ordinary verbiage such as replacing Prabhupada’s “freaks of nature” with your “cataclysm” in BG 2.8 P., to give a single example only. There are hundreds and perhaps thousands of such instances.
What an imposture all along! What fake presentation in the name of Srila Prabhupada. What misleading of the world and the devotee community takes place here!
Not only that, but you also sneakily remove any Prabhupada reference and statement that could expose your nefarious activities, by removing for instance completely the very words “puffed up” from the original Prabhupada formulation in OT BG 2.56.
——————————————————-
And where has the last sentence of OT BG 2.7, Purport, gone?: “And one who attempts to comment on the Bhagavad-gita without knowing this science is the greatest pretender.” Why did you remove it? Did you feel again that Prabhupada was pointing His finger at you?
————————————————-
4.2 Srila Prabhupada’s “This science of the relationship with the Supreme” becomes “this supreme science.” NOT ACCEPTABLE! REJECTED!
—————————————————
3.21 lots to be said here
Flagrant sexism here. They don’t even realise how sexist they are. Srila Prabhupada writes “anyone who desires to improve” and we can see that someone scribbled “himself” on the OT But Hayagriva misses the sentence. Perhaps he was on drugs. Who kows? But Jayadvaita gives ” anyone whom wants to improve HIMSELF. That’s flagrant sexism by all standard. They dont even realise how sexist they are. That means they are a loooooooong way from Krishna consciousness.
_______________________________
3.21 So definitely not “great man” as falsely introduced by Hayagriva and rubber stamped by Jayadvaita but Prabhupada’s “respectable leader of human society” yes!
____________________
3.20 Here Jayadvaita stubbornly subtracts twice the expression “and others”, once in the verse and then in the purport again. What a mule! Prabhupada writes it in the first place and Hayagriva renders it as it is, but the mule Jayadvaita refuses to render it.
________________________
Why was the word “industrialist” erased from BGAII 10.36? Why? Another slap in Srila Prabhupada’s face!
_______________
In OT BG 2.7, purport, Srila Prabhupada writes “…one must approach a spiritual master with Samit (underlined and capitalised by Srila Prabhupada) or ingredients for initiation from the spiritual master, who is in the line of discipline succession…” They just dropped it. Another lazy cheating and betrayal!
___________________
BGAII 3.18
Is the fact that Srila Prabhupada uses the expression “a self realised, Krishna conscious man” in OT purport a sufficient reason to replace His expression ” A self realised person (in Krishna consciousness) in the OT verse itself? Due to the sensitive nature of the topic, we believe it is NOT and we shall call both editors sexist. Besides that why did they drop the expressions “Krishna conscious” and “Krishna consciousness”. That is not acceptable either.
________________________
BGAII 3.17 purport.
Last words of purport “like wine, women and similar infatuations” are a pretty gross non-Prabhupada addition created and introduced by Hayagriva and rubber stamped by Jayadvaita
______________________
BGAII 3.16, purport.
Srila Prabhupada:
“Indirectly, it is the practice of Krishna consciousness, because when advanced in such performances of yajnas, one is sure to become Krishna conscious.”
Hayagriva:
“Indirectly, it is the practice of Krishna consciousness, because when ONE MASTERS THE performance of yajnas, one is sure to become Krishna conscious.”
Jayadvaita:
“Indirectly, it is the practice of Krishna consciousness, because when ONE MASTERS THE performance of yajnas, one is sure to become Krishna conscious.”
This is why I have declared WAR to ISKCON and the BBT.
________________________________
Totally whimsical Jayadvaita in BGAII 10.42 Purport. Why mission with a capital “M”, especially if he adheres to “the less capitals, the better.” as Dravida impressed upon me.
—————————————-
In BG 18.66 both editors removed the expression “in return”. That is a SYMPTOM and PROOF OF GREED AND LAZYNESS. They will take every possible thing from you and give you nothing because they are lazy and greedy thieves. Beware!!! `
—————————————
In BGAII 6.42 both editors cheapen the whole thing by downgrading Srila Prabhupada’s affirmation that taking birth in a family of transcendentalists is very rare. Of course, they know much better than Srila Prabhupada and state that such a birth is “rare” only, meaning Srila Prabhupada is an old idiot and fool. Boot in their face they deserve for such an attitude!!!
______________________
In BG 3.13, both editors get the credit for respecting Srila Prabhupada’s somewhat archaic expression of “compact of love”.
_____________________
They also embezzled the following sentence from BG 2.7, purport: “And one who attempts to comment on the Bhagavad Gita without knowing this science is the greatest pretender.”
Srila Prabhupada made it the last sentence of BG 2.7 Purport. But through the dishonesty of the editors it has disappeared. No one likes dishonest people. They cannot be trusted. One should avoid them like plague or they might ruin oneself.
Bhagavad Gita 18.42 reads:
shamo damas tapah shaucam
ksantir arjavam eva ca
jnanam vijnanam astikyam
brahma-karma svabhava-jam
TRANSLATION
Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, knowledge, wisdom and religiousness — these are the natural qualities by which the brahmanas work.
Ref. VedaBase => Bg 18.42
The Sanskrit “arjavam” means “honesty”.
They are not brahmins. They are pretenders. They are hypocrites.
_____________________________________
Both editors edit the word “false” into for example “senseless” in BG 2.1P or avoid it altogether. That is symptomatic of a certain trait of their character. It means that they themselves harbour something false in themselves. They are bluffers. They are cheaters. They are misleaders. They are rascals. They are wolves among the sheep.
Both in the verse and purport of BG 2.2 they embezzle away the expression “dirty thing(s)”, three times all-together. We will guess, it is because their own hearts are very dirty. Same again in BG 2.61 purport.
Please take action.
We are not in the business of inciting violence.
I repeat again: We are not at all in the business of inciting violence.
We are in the business of quoting Srila Prabhupada, the Founder of ISKCON, the BBT and BTG magazine with a relevant quote for the relevant circumstances.
In such cases of blatant dishonesty and global fraud, Srila Prabhupada had a special formula as follows:
“KIck them in their faces with boot.”
For the last 50 years, this phrase itself has been hidden from the general public by straying and dishonest editors.
___________________
And how else can we explain the fact that they always write “Chapter” and the chapter’s number with capital letters but to say that this is truly superstition.
These editors are superstitious !!!
This is the mode of ignorance.
________________________________
Horrible condense job on BG 2.69, purport.
_____________________
SEXISM in 2.67 where Srila Prabhupada’s “person”becomes a “man”. And because the word is associated with intelligence it is even more insulting to women because in this case they deprive women of any intelligence.
SEXISM in BG 2.72 where Srila Prabhupada’s “nobody”becomes a “man”.
_________________________________________
In BG 2.63, Iskcon, the BBt, Hayagriva and Jayadvaita are trying to convince the world that all people are crazy because they replace Srila Prabhupada’s “illusion” with “delusion”. And after repeating things thousands of time it becomes a realty. This is a very subtle criminal enterprise of manipulation, mind control and brainwashing and will get worse as time passes if no action is taken.
Here is my MacBook definition of “delusion”:
delusion | dɪˈl(j)uːʒn | noun a false belief or judgment about external reality, held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, occurring especially in mental conditions:
Whereas “illusion” is a benign condition.
Dated Aug 24 2024
————————————————————–
And in BG 2.61 P there a typical example of Jayadvaita’s only flaming imagination where he makes a “blazing fire” out of “small flames ” as given by both by Srila Prabhuapada and Hayagriva Prabhu. This is typical of his cheating tendency and also his somewhat sinister tendency to create fear in the mind of the reader by exaggerating out of proportion. What rascaldom! He has definitely lost his position as editor. He is definitely dismissed from his editor’s position.
This is a technic for manipulating people and probably borders with brain washing.
He probably belongs to the same class of people who originally created and now perpetrate the lie that Lord Jesus Christ died on the cross. Let us beware of these type of individuals.
In his unyielding pride, Jayadvaita is simply bluffing like an ordinary conditioned soul and taking and misleading the whole of ISKCON as well as the whole world with him. What rascaldom. He needs to be stopped!
How can he be trusted?
HE CANNOT BE TRUSTED!!!
———————————-
And why do these obsolete and redundant editors have a tendency to just drop whole expressions used by Srila Prabhupada. This represents always an impoverishment and a kind of castration of Srila Prabhupada’s message to the world. Why do they do that???
In BG 2.61 they dropped “from the turmoil created by the sage” The word “turmoil”, as always, is so carefully and expertly picked by Srila Parbhupada!
from”On the other hand, the King, although not a yogi as powerful as the sage and yet a devotee of the Lord, silently tolerated all injustice of the sage, and thus came out victorious from the turmoil created by the sage. “
which becomes the poorer sentence
“On the other hand, the King, although not a yogi as powerful as the sage and yet a devotee of the Lord, silently tolerated all injustice of the sage, and thus came out victorious. “
___________________________________________
WHAT STUBBORN STUPIDITY of CHAOTIC AND WHIMSICAL MINDS!
BG 2.59 is all about taste. But here both editors replace Srila Prabhupada’s “taste” with their arrogant and stupid concoction”knowledge”.
In OT Srila Prabupada writes:
“Similary, sense restrictions by some spiritual process like astanga-yoga, in the matter of yam, niyam, asana,pranayam, dhyana dharana pratyahara etc., are recommended for the less intelligent persons who have no better taste.”
Both Hayagriva and Jayadvaita come up with their arrogant and stupid concoction:
“Similary, sense restrictions by some spiritual process like astanga-yoga, in the matter of yam, niyam, asana,pranayam, dhyana dharana pratyahara etc., are recommended for the less intelligent persons who have no better knowledge.”
Whereas in the next verse BG2.60, these chaotic and whimsical minds just do the opposite and drop Srila Prabhupada’s”knowledge” from
“O son of Kunti, the senses are so strong that they forcibly carry away the mind toward sense enjoyment, even of a man with full discriminating knowledge who is endeavouring to control them.”
to
“The senses are so strong and impetuous, O Arjuna, that they forcibly carry away the mind even of a man of discrimination who is endeavoring to control them.”
without even mentioning the other illegal and evident alterations.
__________________________________
Another falsification in BG 2.51 where “planets” become “death.”
In OT Srila Prabhupada writes:
But one who understands his real constitutional position as eternal servitor of the Lord, and thus knows the position of the Personality of Godhead, certainly engages himself in the transcendental loving service of the Lord and thus becomes qualified for entering into the Vaikuntha planets, where there is no material, miserable life nor the influence of time and the planets.
and current version says:
But one who understands his real constitutional position as the eternal servitor of the Lord, and thus knows the position of the Personality of Godhead, engages himself in the transcendental loving service of the Lord. Consequently he becomes qualified to enter into the Vaikuntha planets, where there is neither material, miserable life nor the influence of time and death.
———————————————————
Here BG 2.51 P. is another misinterpretation.
In OT Srila Prabhupada writes: “He does not know that any kind of material body and anywhere within the universe cannot give life without any miseries.”
which becomes in the mind of the fake editors:
“They do not know that no kind of material body anywhere within the universe can give life without miseries.”
Can you spot the difference?
_______________________________________
Bg 2.48 P, again the editors foolishly dare to correct Srila Prabhupada, their Guru.
Srila Prabhupada writes: “Yoga means to concentrate the mind upon the Supreme by controlling the ever-disturbing mind”, which makes perfect sense.
They have crossed out “mind” and in hand writing have added “the sense” thus: “Yoga means to concentrate the mind upon the Supreme by controlling the ever-disturbing senses.”
Here again in Bg 2.48 P., both editors display their foolish and offensive audacity towards Guru. The editors’ unspoken message is again:”Don’t you know, you foolish and senile Srila Prabhupada, that it is not the mind that’s ever disturbing but the sense instead. We know that for sure because you have taught us so.” Its like biting the hand that feeds you. Such rascaldom!
When the great acharya Madhavendra Puri was on his death bed and was crying in ecstasy of love of Godhead, His disciple Ramacandra Puri dared to fearlessly instruct his spiritual master as follows:””If you are in full transcendental bliss,” he said, “you should now remember only Brahman. Why are you crying?”
Srila Madhavendra Puri’s reply came with lightning speed: “Get out you sinful rascal” CC Antya, Ch. 8 text 22
and
Antya Ch8 text 24:””Don’t show your face to me! Go anywhere else you like. If I die seeing your face, I shall not achieve the destination of my life.”
Antya Ch8 text 99:”If one’s spiritual master rejects him, one becomes so fallen that he, like Ramacandra Puri, commits offenses even to the Supreme Personality of Godhead
__________________________________
We also note that Srila Prabhupada’s “fruitive” is not to be found in any of my English dictionaries. Does that mean we have to ban this word? Not at all. Let the proud and abundantly populated dictionaries adapt to Srila Prabhupada, a master brahmin in education and culture, and introduce the word in around the input “fruit”. Now we shall find frugivorous, fruit, fruitage, fruit cake, fruited, fruiterer, fruit fly, fruition, fruitless, fruit sugar, frumenttaceous. But we dont find FRUITIVE. Its quite symptomatic, because really no one wants to admit their greediness. The analysis of a people’s language is a snapshot of their mental make up. This science is called philology.
We all know what Srila Prabhupada says about the English language:
“Yes, Sanskrit is spoken not only on Krishna Loka but also in higher planets, of the demigods. It is called the language of God and the demigods. It was spoken also on this planet, when people were all godly, they used to speak in Sanskrit. Sanskrit is the origin of all languages of the civilized peoples. It is most perfect, not only descriptive; the word “Sanskrit” means “the most perfect”. Because not a single word you can pronounce without having a bona fide principle. It is not like the English language, “but, put” with irrational difference in pronunciation, no principles. Sanskrit isn’t like that. Therefore it is perfect. It isn’t whimsical. English poetry has one line one inch long, next line 600 inches long. Sanskrit is not like that. There are strict principles, and it is so beautiful. Therefore in Sanskrit language not an ordinary man can become a poet. No other language of the world can be compared with it. No other language of the world is so perfect as Sanskrit. Any language near to Sanskrit language (like Bengali) is nearer to perfection. Sanskrit is pronounced same way here or there, it is standard.
Ref. VedaBase => Letter to: Madhusudana — Los Angeles 1 February, 1968
______________________
On two further occasions both editors want to be superior to Guru. What foolishness! This is also an attempt to mislead and brainwash the readers of Bhagavad-gita.
BG 2.39. Srila Prabhupada never wrote “imposter Kapila”, he writes “imitation Kapila”
But we may call them imposters. Imposter Hayagriva and imposter Jayadvaita.
And in BG 2.40, Srila Prabhupada never wrote the following sentence . “Or as the Christians says, What profiteth a man if he gains the whole world, yet suffer the loss of his eternal soul.”
This is a cheating import of imposter Hayagriva and imposter Jayadvaita .
__________________________________
In BG 2.41 both editors again have embezzled not only once but twice the expression ” Krishna consciousness”. This is nothing less than demoniac.
____________________________________
I
One positive point. In BG 2.40 P last paragraph both Hayagriva and Jayadvaita change Prabhupada’s “man” into a gender neutral expression. That is a good move.
_____________________________
We also note that the editors systematically drop Srila Prabhupada’s adverb “kindly” from the verses. “Kindly” is an adverb that smoothes up communication and kindness relates deeply to the humanity of every human being. In BG 10.12-13 they have unlawfully removed the expression “my dear Krishna”, an expression of affection. In other words, Srila Prabhupada originally introduced an element of kindness into the Gita and these editors and their supporters have brutally and surgically cut it out. No kindness here!!! No wonder HH Jayapataka Maharaja writes here http://www.dandavats.com/?p=88925 that a scientific analysis has found that ISKCON rates very low on the scale of devotee care.
The editors also seem to have a visceral aversion for some English words that Srila Prabhupada is very fond of such as “nobody”, “callous”, “poor fund of knowledge”(BG 2,29 P and blatantly in verse 2.42-43 and three times in purport as well), “kindly”, “opposite number”, “freaks” (Bg 2.8 P) and “brahmin” (BG 2.7 P & BG 2.31 ) This are Prabhupadisms the world should become acquainted with and use in everyday language. That degree of familiarity with Srila Prabhupada’s message and terminology will be a great victory for the Krishna consciousness movement! BTW my MacBook dictionary completely endorses “brahmin”. So, again, we ought to follow in Srila Prabhupada’s footsteps and use the word “brahmin”, instead of “brahmana”. Because of the combination of the two vowels “a” and “I”, “brahmin” sound much better, whereas “brahmana” offers only a hackneyed repetition of three “a”s There is also a music to literature, which is not to neglected!
The word “please” is eradicated from BG 2.37. What is wrong with “please”. What is wrong with being polite in ordinary affairs? And why did Srila Prabhupada attract such a world following? Part of the reasons is that he was extremely courteous, tactful, clever and compassionate.
——————————————————
In Bg 18.78 these pretender editors even have the foolishness and/or temerity to push out the Supreme Personality of Godhead Himself from His own book!
Srila Prabhupada writes:
BG 18.78 Wherever there is Krishna, the master of all mystics and Supreme Personality of Godhead, and wherever there is Arjuna, the supreme archer, there will also certainly be opulence, victory, extraordinary power and morality. That is my opinion.
Both Hayagriva and Jayadvaita write:
“Wherever there is Krishna, the master of all mystics, and wherever there is Arjuna, the supreme archer, there will also certainly be opulence, victory, extraordinary power, and morality. That is my opinion.
Clearly these 2 low lives are not interested in morality. They have no morality. And above all they are not interested in the Supreme Personality of Godhead. They are simply seeking opulence, victory and extraordinary power. But how can one get one without the other?
Actually this is demoniac!
To minus Krishna from anywhere, especially from His own book Bhagavad-gita is demoniac par excellence.
These two editors Hayagriva and Jayadvaita are demons .
We allow ourselves to be lead by demons.
Please take action.
——————————————
In BG 2.25, very last part of the purport, Srila Prabhupada writes in the Original Transcript:
“As eternally unchangeable, he remains atomic always in comparison to the Infinite Supreme Soul. The Supreme Soul is infinite and the atomic soul is infinitesimal. Therefore, the infinitesimal soul, being unchangeable, can never become equal with the infinite soul, or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Such things are repeatedly being stated in different ways, just to confirm the stability of the conception of the soul. Repetition of something is to understand the thing nicely, without any error.”
Jayadvaita and current official version of Bhagavad-gita As It Is give:
As eternally unchangeable, the soul remains atomic in comparison to the infinite Supreme Soul. The Supreme Soul is infinite, and the atomic soul is infinitesimal. Therefore, the infinitesimal soul, being unchangeable, can never become equal to the infinite soul, or the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This concept is repeated in the Vedas in different ways just to confirm the stability of the conception of the soul. Repetition of something is necessary in order that we understand the matter thoroughly, without error.
First of all there is the very old question of use of capital letters.
Simple logic would dictate that if we add another adjective to the expression “Supreme Soul”, that adjective would also require a capital letter such as “the Infinite Supreme Soul” and not ” the infinite Supreme Soul”. This is the power of association with the Supreme!
And what business have the editors to arrogantly correct Guru in the last two lines?
“Such things are repeatedly being stated in different ways, just to confirm the stability of the conception of the soul. Repetition of something is to understand the thing nicely, without any error.” becomes “This concept is repeated in the Vedas in different ways just to confirm the stability of the conception of the soul. Repetition of something is necessary in order that we understand the matter thoroughly, without error.”
Both Hayagriva and Jayadvaita intellectualise Srila prabhupada’s “such thing into” “this concept”. Let Srila Prabhupada’s, in some cases simple language, flow to the people of the word and you editors please get out the way. You are a hindrance only. Same applies to the last sentence.
Neither are we fools. We know that this takes place “in the Vedas” If this precision would have been required, Srila Prabhupada would have added it. Don’t try to be smarter than Guru and correct Him unnecessarily!
You are of no help, you are simply a hindrance to the flow of Guru’s mercy. Let us revert to Srila Prabhupada’s original phraseology and you so-called editors get out the way or you will be washed away into oblivion by the powerful flow of Srila Prabhupad’s mercy. You are redundant and obsolete pretenders!
______________________________
In Bg 2.24, purport, we encounter Srila Prabhupada, the perfect logician, who on the premise that the soul cannot be burned, concludes that there are living entities even on the sun planet. We invite those who doubt such a statement just to go and have a look :):):)
We also note that the editors illegally replaced Srila Prabhupada’s “false” with “meaningless”, as the very last word of purport 2.24
In Bg 2.27, purport, however, both editors embezzle Srila Prabhupada’s opening expression “according to logicians”.Why is being done? What is the real reason that motivates the editors? Logicians don’t seem to be welcome here, whereas Srila Prabhupada Himself is the greatest logician. This smacks of manipulation, mind control and plain dishonesty. And if we follow a dishonest version of a great book, we ourselves certainly will become dishonest.
______________________________________________
In BG 2.29, purport, very first sentence, the over-intelligent editors embezzle again Prabhupada’s word “parallel”. This is not at all acceptable, as “parallel” is a scientific term and belongs to the world of mathematics. As opposed to cow-dung-minds, there is rigor, in Prabhupad’s character, an essential component for an empire builder.
Here is Srila Prabhupada rendition:
“Since Gitopanishad is fully based on the principles of the Upanishads, an exactly parallel passage appears in the Katha (Prabhupada: Katho) Upanishad appears as follows:”
We may also ask why does Srila Prabhupada insist on “KathO Upanishad” He may have a valid reason.
__________________________________________________
And compare Srila Prabhupada’s
“This sense of realization that the atomic soul is present within the body of a gigantic animal, in the body of a gigantic banyan tree, and that the same small atomic soul is also present in the microbic germs of which millions and billion in number can be accomodated in an inch of space – is certainly very, very amazing for the common man.” in BG OT 2.29
to the current
“The fact that the atomic soul is within the body of a gigantic animal, in the body of a gigantic banyan tree, and also in the microbic germs, millions and billions of which occupy only an inch of space, is certainly very amazing.”
IT HAS BECOME SO IMPOVERISHED!!!
WHAT A LITERARY MASSACRE!!!
________________________________________________________
and just see BG 2.30’s drastic changes and plain sloppy work from Srila Prabhupada’s
2.30 O descendant of Bharata, the owner of the body can never be killed. As such you do not need to lament for any living entity.
Purport. 2.30 The Lord now concludes the chapter of instruction about the immutable spirit soul. Beginning from “asocyan anvasocas tvam” (Bhagavad-gita 2.11) up to ”dehi nityam avadhyo ‘yam” (Bhagavad-gita 2.30), He has described about the immortal soul in various ways and in every step He has tried to establish that the soul is immortal, but that the body is temporary. Therefore Arjuna as a ksatriya should not have deviated from his duty out of fear that his grandfather or teacher, like Bishma and Drona respectively, would die in the battle. On the authority of Sri Krishna, one has to believe therefore that there is a soul different from the material body, and one should not believe that there is no such thing as soul, but that living symptoms develop at a certain stage of material maturity as a result from the interaction of chemicals. Violence is not encouraged with the knowledge that the soul is immortal. But at the same time war is not discouraged when there is actual need for it. That is justified in terms of the sanction of the Lord, and not capriciously.
to the current offical rendition
Verses BG 2.30. O descendant of Bharata, he who dwells in the body can never be slain. Therefore you need not grieve for any living being.
Purport 2.230 The Lord now concludes the chapter of instruction on the immutable spirit soul. In describing the immortal soul in various ways, Lord Krsna establishes that the soul is immortal and the body is temporary. Therefore Arjuna as a ksatriya should not abandon his duty out of fear that his grandfather and teacher — Bhisma and Drona — will die in the battle. On the authority of Sri Krsna, one has to believe that there is a soul different from the material body, not that there is no such thing as soul, or that living symptoms develop at a certain stage of material maturity resulting from the interaction of chemicals. Though the soul is immortal, violence is not encouraged, but at the time of war it is not discouraged when there is actual need for it. That need must be justified in terms of the sanction of the Lord, and not capriciously.
Ref. VedaBase => Bg 2.30
______________________________________________
In OT BG 2.35 Srila Prabhupada uses the word “fig” as he uses it also in the Krishna book chapter “Talks between Krishna and Rukmini”: “All these princes were very much puffed up with their worldly possessions and did not care a fig for anyone who came before them.” In fact Srila Prabhupada Vedabase uses the word “fig” 122 times. My point is that we should keep the word “fig” in BG 2.35, perhaps as follows:
“The great generals who had very high estimation for your name and fame will consider that you have left the battlefield out of fear only, and thus they will not care a fig for you.”
_________________________________________________
And again in the last sentence and even last words of BG 2.34, purport, and in innumerable other instances in the same Bhagavad-gita, smart-arses Hayagriva and Jayadvaita find Srila Prabhupada’s formulation: “So the final judgement of the Lord on Arjuna was to die in the battle, and not to go away.” perhaps too simple and feel an urge to replace it with their so-called more educated formulas: ” So, the final judgment of the Lord was for Arjuna to die in the battle and not withdraw.”
Clearly, the unspoken message here again is that Srila Prabhupada really is an uneducated fool from a backward country. What proud, treacherous and offensive rascaldom!
___________________________________________________
Ref. VedaBase => Bg 2.35
This is subversion at its best. Let us bring back Srila Prabhupada into His own literary production after pushing Him viciously and brutally out of it!
Therefore I am rightly advertising, for the time being, we only have two versions of Srila Prabhupada’s jewel Bhagavad-gita As It Is as follows:
Free wheeling Bhagavad-gita As It Is NOT by Hayagriva Das, full of mistakes that a primary school child will very easily spot and correct. But no one does anything about it. Who will take this seriously? And what an embarrassment for Srila Prabhupada!
and
Free wheeling Bhagavad-gita As It Is NOT by Jayadvaita, the abracadabra version.
And above all, what an affront to Srila Prabhupada!
Every time we change Srila Prabhupada’s parampara version unnecessarily, (the Original Transcript version (OT) is the closest we have to a parampara version at this stage and it is in bad shape too), and replace it with our own private, nonsense speculations or support such illegal changes, WE POSITIVELY SLAP SRILA PRABHUPADA IN THE FACE. and mislead the whole world as well. Do we really think this will go unpunished? .
This is what Srila Prabhupada designates as utter foolishness and rascaldom.
A fool is always a rascal because he is a fool and will mess things up.
But rascals can be malevolently very intelligent in introducing their own hidden agendas.
They deserve to be cut down unceremoniously!
Hopefully Lord Krishna will see to that.
The great authority Sukadeva Gosvami remarks that Krsna almost always passed His time with Rukmini, and Rukmini was a bit proud to be so fortunate that Krsna never left her even for a moment. Krsna, however, does not like any of His devotees to be proud. As soon as a devotee becomes so, by some tactic He cuts down that pride. In this case also, Krsna said many things which were hard for Rukmini to hear. She could only conclude that although she was proud of her position, Krsna could be separated from her at any moment.
Ref. VedaBase => KB 60: Talks Between Krsna and Rukmini
BG 18.42, version 3, states about honesty, in Sanskrit language “arjavam”:
“18.42 Peacefulness, self-control, austerity, purity, tolerance, honesty, knowledge, wisdom and religiousness—these are the natural qualities by which the brahmins work.”
Please take action.
We are not in the business of inciting violence.
I repeat again: We are not in the business of inciting violence.
We are in the business of quoting Srila Prabhupada, the Founder of ISKCON, the BBT and BTG magazine with a relevant quote for the relevant circumstances.
In such cases of blatant dishonesty and global fraud, Srila Prabhupada had a special formula as follows:
“KIck them in their faces with boot.”
He was at the time addressing the scientists, who are bluffing the states out of billions of dollars for their childish games like going to the moon.
Sounds a bit like a Stalinist savagery, is it not??? We certainly are spiritual communists. There is no doubt about that. That’s what we have in common with China. We are spiritual communists. I mean mostly the communist part of the expression. Not sure about the spiritual part. I have never been to China. Some devotees reside in China, others regularly visit China. May be talking to them will help. But nothing can replace the direct experience. For the time being, I cannot move internationally, as I am in the process of changing my name to something more spiritual. I lodged my electronic application yesterday 29th of September 2024 at the Queensland Registry of Birth, Death and Marriages, at the cost of AU$ 205 something.
Funny thing is that, in the old days of ISKCON, there was a rumour that Srila Prabhupada had said that the Chinese will join Krishna consciousness last and will become the strongest advocates for Krishna consciousness. Rumor or reality? Who knows? Well informed readers please give your comment. We depend on you. Thank you.
The modern theory of dialectical communism, set forth by Karl Marx and followed by communist governments, is not perfect. According to Vedic communism, no one in the state should ever starve. Presently there are many bogus institutions which are collecting funds from the public for the purpose of giving food to starving people, but these funds are invariably misused. According to the Vedic instructions, the government should arrange things in such a way that there will be no question of starvation. In the Srimad-Bhagavatam it is stated that a householder must see to it that even a lizard or a snake does not starve. They also must be given food. In actuality, however, there is no question of starvation because everything is the property of the Supreme Lord, and He sees to it that there is ample arrangement for feeding everyone. In the Vedas (Katha Upanisad 2.2.13) it is said: eko bahunam yo vidadhati kaman. The Supreme Lord supplies the necessities of life to everyone, and there is no question of starvation. If anyone starves, it is due to the mismanagement of the so-called ruler, governor or president. Ref. VedaBase => SB 4.22.45
--The Australian Society for Krishna Culture. AUSKCULTURE, operation start 1984 -- ABN 65 231 425 870. 