–The Australian Society for Krishna Culture. AUSKCULTURE, operation start 1984 — ABN 65 231 425 870.

As purport to BGAII 3.35, Srila Prabhupada writes in the Original Transcript (OT):

One should therefore discharge his prescribed duties in full Krishna consciousness rather than to do things prescribed for others. Materially, these prescribed duties are according to one’s psychophysical condition, under the spell of the modes of material nature. Spiritually, such duties are as ordered by the spiritual master within the realm of the transcendental service of Krishna.
 
But both materially and spiritually one should stick to his prescribed duties even up to death, rather than imitate another’s prescribed duties. Duties on the spiritual platform and duties on the material platform may be different, but the principle of following the authorised direction is always good for the performer. Materially when one is under the spell of the modes of material nature, one should follow the prescribed rules of such different situations without imitating others. For example, a Brahmin, who is in the modes of goodness, is ordered to follow non violence, while a ksatriya, who is in the modes of passion, is allowed to be violent. As such, for a ksatriya, it is better to be vanquished by following the rules of violence, than imitate the rules of the Brahmin, who follows the principles of non violence. Everyone has to cleanse his heart by a gradual process and not abruptly. When one is however transcendental to the modes of material nature and is fully situated in Krishna consciousness, one can perform anything and everything under the direction of the bona fide spiritual master. In that complete state of Krishna consciousness, the Kshatriya may act as a Brahmin, or a Brahmin may act as a Kshatriya. In the tanscendental stage, there is no conception of the so-called distinctions of the material word. For example, Vishmamitra was originally a Kshatriya, but later on he acted as a Brahmin, while Parashurama was a Brahmin, but later on He acted as a Kshatriya. Being transcendentally situated, they could do so; but as long as one is on the material platform, he must perform the duties according to the modes of material nature but at the same it he must have a full sense of Krishna consciousness.

Which Jayadvaita renders as:

One should therefore discharge his prescribed duties in full Krsna consciousness rather than those prescribed for others. Materially, prescribed duties are duties enjoined according to one’s psychophysical condition, under the spell of the modes of material nature. Spiritual duties are as ordered by the spiritual master for the transcendental service of Krsna. But whether material or spiritual, one should stick to his prescribed duties even up to death, rather than imitate another’s prescribed duties. Duties on the spiritual platform and duties on the material platform may be different, but the principle of following the authorized direction is always good for the performer. When one is under the spell of the modes of material nature, one should follow the prescribed rules for his particular situation and should not imitate others. For example, a brahmana, who is in the mode of goodness, is nonviolent, whereas a ksatriya, who is in the mode of passion, is allowed to be violent. As such, for a ksatriya it is better to be vanquished following the rules of violence than to imitate a brahmana who follows the principles of nonviolence. Everyone has to cleanse his heart by a gradual process, not abruptly. However, when one transcends the modes of material nature and is fully situated in Krsna consciousness, he can perform anything and everything under the direction of a bona fide spiritual master. In that complete stage of Krsna consciousness, the ksatriya may act as a brahmana, or a brahmana may act as a ksatriya. In the transcendental stage, the distinctions of the material world do not apply. For example, Visvamitra was originally a ksatriya, but later on he acted as a brahmana, whereas Parasurama was a brahmana but later on he acted as a ksatriya. Being transcendentally situated, they could do so; but as long as one is on the material platform, he must perform his duties according to the modes of material nature. At the same time, he must have a full sense of Krsna consciousness.

and Hayagriva as:

One should therefore discharge his prescribed duties in full Krsna consciousness rather than those prescribed for others. Prescribed duties complement one’s psychophysical condition, under the spell of the modes of material nature. Spiritual duties are as ordered by the spiritual master, for the transcendental service of Krsna. But both materially or spiritually, one should stick to his prescribed duties even up to death, rather than imitate another’s prescribed duties. Duties on the spiritual platform and duties on the material platform may be different, but the principle of following the authorized direction is always good for the performer. When one is under the spell of the modes of material nature, one should follow the prescribed rules for particular situations and should not imitate others. For example, a brahmana, who is in the mode of goodness, is nonviolent, whereas a ksatriya, who is in the mode of passion, is allowed to be violent. As such, for a ksatriya it is better to be vanquished following the rules of violence than to imitate a brahmana who follows the principles of nonviolence. Everyone has to cleanse his heart by a gradual process, not abruptly. However, when one transcends the modes of material nature and is fully situated in Krsna consciousness, he can perform anything and everything under the direction of the bona fide spiritual master. In that complete stage of Krsna consciousness, the ksatriya may act as a brahmana, or a brahmana may act as a ksatriya. In the transcendental stage, the distinctions of the material world do not apply. For example, Visvamitra was originally a ksatriya, but later on he acted as a brahmana, whereas Parasurama was a brahmana, but later on he acted as a ksatriya. Being transcendentally situated, they could do so; but as long as one is on the material platform, he must perform his duties according to the modes of material nature. At the same time, he must have a full sense of Krsna consciousness.

We note that although at the first instance he tolerates the martial term “order” in “Spiritual duties are as ordered by the spiritual master”, the second time the rascal cannot resist to falsify the text by quickly removing Srila Prabhupada’s “For example, a Brahmin, who is in the modes of goodness, is ordered to follow non violence,” and replace it with his own unauthorised concoction ” For example, a brahmana, who is in the mode of goodness, is nonviolent,” This action represents wilfully falsifying an original law text and due to the importance of Bhagavad Gita As It Is, it may be a criminal act as well. Lawyers and judges will have to determine the technical details.

under construction….

Here we see from left to right: Srila Prabhupada Himself, Shrutakirti Prabhu, the author of “What is the difficulty?”, distributed by TSKP.VRN@pamho.net. “What is the difficulty” is a favourite expression of Srila Prabhupada to challenge His disciples. Then comes late Brahmananda Prabhu, a trusted and close lieutenant of Srila Prabhupada. Brahmananda Prabhu has a brother, also in Krishna consciousness, his name is Gargamuni Das or the servant of the thinker named “Garga”. I met him once or twice in Germany in the ninety seventies, as he was planning and preparing to import by land some Mercedes vans to India for use in Lord Caitanya’s Samkirtan Movement. Srila Prabhupada used to joke Gargamoney, because he supplied Srila Prabhupada with ample amounts of money or “Lakshmi” for His Krishna conscious projects. The fourth person is difficult to identify because of the flowers that obscure his face. It could be Harikesha Prabhu, because of the glasses but may not be either. Actually Srutakirti Prabhu says this person’s name is Nitai. They are all gazing at what is presumably a newly published Prabhupada book. TKCO

So what about the distinguished letters “acbsp” (no need for pompous capital letters) standing for certified disciple of His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, the greatest philosopher, the greatest author, Founder-Acarya of ISKCON and Founder of the BBT and BTG magazine, in good standing now?

Does it mean a class of ladies and gentlemen whose number is for ever fixed and decreasing as time passes? Is that what it means? That would be so un-transcendental, would it not be?

And who is a Srila Prabhupada disciple anyway?

My suggested reply would be that ANYONE who pledges exclusive allegiance to His Divine Grace A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, both with his intellect AND his work or karma, through His bona fide representatives and who pledges exclusive allegiance to His teachings and is able and willing to follows them to the very best of his or her ability is a Prabhupada disciple.

But we need generational differentiation.

What some call “direct discipleship” of Srila Prabhupada or diksha discipleship is not available any more on the market place of the holy name. Since the last 47 years, this good has just gone forever and just see how Srila Prabhupada’s diksha disciples are valuable, unique and irreplaceable individuals. With the disappearance of His Divine Grace, which we have celebrated yesterday, November 5th 2024, at the new premisses of ISKCON Brisbane, the option to acquire this qualification has gone forever. And as time passes the process will repeat itself over and over again, as it has repeated itself in the past. I may be here today but after some time I will be gone, relinquishing this material body forever and the same applies to everyone else.

So the easy way to solve the matter and to convey the appropriate message is to add the relevant cardinal number to (acbsp).

Srila Prabhupada’s “direct disciples” or diksha disciples will carry (acbsp1)

His grand disciple or shiksha disciple will carry (acbsp2)

Srila Prabhupada great-grand-disciples, again shiksha disciple, will carry (acbsp3) etc etc ……

In other words and naturally each Guru only has one generation of diksha-and-shiksha disciples, meaning to say a diksha disciples is also a shiksha disciples and all other spiritual descendants will be shiksha disciples. But the very great majority of shiksha disciples will not be disksha disciples.

This is especially the case with Srila Prabhupada due to Srila Prabhupada’s overwhelming stature. When I visited USA, what struck me the most are these overwhelmingly huge buildings, almost as big as mountains. And this gives us an idea of Srila Prabhupada stature in the landscape of SELF-REALIZATION. These days the tallest building in the world is not to be found in USA. It is to be found in Dubai, United Arab Emirates or UAE. The S from USA migrates to the end and while migrating changes into a E. And this is how we travel from USA to UAE to find the tallest building in the world: the Burj Khalifa at 2717 feet or 828 meters. And this is Srila Prabhupada’s stature in the landscape of SELF-REALIZATION. Srila Prabhupada is the tallest. No one can equal him and no can surpass him in the matter of achievements in the realm of SELF-REALIZATION, a bit like Krishna Himself Who is “asamordhva” . No one can equal or surpass Him in anything and that’s another definition of God.

We note that it is in Dubai as well, where we find some of the sweetest kirtans ever heard by ISKCON devotees such as HH BB Govinda Maharaja, Yogindra Prabhu and Akincana Krishna Prabhu etc etc …There really is something special about Dubai, a city of around 3.79 million inhabitants.

And now that President Trump is back in the White House, he might want to scribble down on his list of things to do: To built the tallest building in the world “To Make America Great Again.”

This is in my view, the best and most democratic way to solve the (acbsp) matter.

If you have a better solution, please let me know. Thank you.

BGAII 3.35 Another idiot-syn-crazy lucubration of by Jayadvaita.

Just behold this picture of a time waster, who just loves to confuse and befuddle people in following his fake-loving mind.

As Benjamin Netanyahu said of his own war: the war will stop when the goal is reached. 

Similarly these attacks will stop when ISKCON and the BBT will agree to take down Jayadvaita along with his most nonsensical mis-representation of Srila Prabhupada’s Bhagavad Gita As It Is.

His (Benjamin’s) is a hot war with all traditional military paraphernalia and the dead.

PRECAUTIONARY INFORMATION FOLLOWS:

“Just in case someone is not clear about this, ours is a war of propaganda, a war of words, a war of pen over sword. But the ultimate outcome can be just as devastating. This is a possible meaning of killing someone by mantras, as brahmins used to do. We can do it. We can obliterate the criminal Jayadvaita just by mantra propaganda.”

===========================================================

Everyone of good faith may join this propaganda and call the book for what it actually is. 

This is NOT Bhagavad Gita AS It Is by Srila Prabhupada. This is a hoax, a BIG CHEAT, an ulterior-motives-promotion and a thousand knife stabs into Srila Prabhupada’s back and grand betrayal of Srila Prabhupada by Jayadvaita, ISKCON and the BBT. These three parties ISKCON, the BBT and the criminal Jayadvaita are the plotters and have been so for the last 40 years. (since 1983) and now the time has come to take down this whole nonsense.

Instead we may call this book  “Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT” by the criminal and imposter Jayadvaita.

Please EVERYONE call this book “Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT” by the criminal and imposter Jayadvaita, UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES. 

==========================================================

Jayadvaita is a criminal, he is morally corrupt. An evil mind-bender and confuser,–whence I am using the word “abacadabra”, as in the domain of sorcery or black magic– as opposed to a Krishna conscious educator or educator of any kind. He pretends to know, whereas in fact he does not know and that fits snuggly into Srila Prabhupada’s definition of a material cheater. What’s spiritual about him anyway??? Down with him and his energies and that includes his Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT. 

And if ISKCON and the BBT are not volunteering to take down Jayadvaita and his nonsense rendition of Bhagavad Gita relatively soon, then will shall enlist both ISKCON and the BBT under the heading “criminal parties to be pursued” and make them accomplice and co-guilty parties in this global cheating and brain washing process, which is taking place right now under our eyes. It will be the sparking and sparkling “spiritual show” of the century.

Let us get back to BGAII analysis now and more specifically BGAII 3.35

Here is simple and easy BGAII OT 3.35 by Srila Prabhupada:

“It is far better to discharge one’s own prescribed duties even though they are faulty, than another’s prescribed duties. If one is destroyed in the course of discharging one’s duty, that is also better than being engaged in other duties.”

Here is “Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT” by Hayagriva 3.35:

“It is far better to discharge one’s prescribed duties, even though they may be faulty, than another’s duties. Destruction in the course of performing one’s own duty is better than engaging in another’s duties, for to follow another’s path is dangerous.”

Please note that, but for the added notion of danger, the honest Hayagriva follows Srila Prabhupada quite nicely.

Now comes idiot’s and crazy man’s Jayadvaita version also falsely promoted by ISKCON and the BBT as THE OFFICIAL VERSION: 

“It is far better to discharge one’s prescribed duties, even though faultily, than another’s duties perfectly. Destruction in the course of performing one’s own duty is better than engaging in another’s duties, for to follow another’s path is dangerous.”

Jayadvaita is so puffed and crazy that he dares to put fake words in the mouth of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Sri Krishna, Who (with a capital letter once and for all) according to him says also: “It is far better to discharge one’s prescribed duties, even though faultily, than another’s duties perfectly.”  But who does he think he is? He obviously thinks that he is even more and even better than God, Sri Krishna Himself. Down with Jayadvaita, down with him now! And foolish accomplices follow him and applaud: “Well done Jayadvaita, well done, you are such a learned, advanced and leading scholar. The more befuddling abracadabra words, the better.” 

For the last 50 years, I have been trying to find a plausible reply to the following question. Once I even tried to discuss it with Ajita, the manager of ISKCON New Govardhana, without any conclusive result, indeed. “Why should God or Krishna, the smartest and most sophisticated being, prefer faulty goods and / or services to perfect ones.” Who in his right mind will ever choose the descending and degrading reality and prefer lower quality to higher quality. Finally, here is the answer. It is nothing but a cheating and fake mirage produced by the time wasting, fake and imposter Jayadvaita. Don’t you think that, in the great Srila Prabhupada tradition, he really deserves to be kicked in the face with heavy steel framed boots for wasting people’s time and befuddling them in that way? He sure does! This is similar and parallel to the Krishna book passage where Krishna’s adversary produces a fake video of Vasudeva’s killing to vainly sap Krishna’s morale in the fight. This morally corrupt Jayadvaita has got a little mystic power which he uses for evil ends. Please beware.

Strictly speaking, I cannot and will not indulge in debate about what’s to be found in Sri Krishna’s Sanskrit rendition of BGAII 3.35. The most qualified Sanskritist among all of us is Srila Prabhupada and He (again with a Fatima capital letter once and for all) sees and gives us:

“It is far better to discharge one’s own prescribed duties even though they are faulty, than another’s prescribed duties. If one is destroyed in the course of discharging one’s duty, that is also better than being engaged in other duties.” (BTW, at least for the first part, this is also Noosa Lord Mayor ‘s realisation of BGAII, as he personally told me. Just see how Krishna conscious the Lord Mayor of Noosa, Councillor Frank Wilkie is!!! Our humble congratulations to him!)

So “It is far better to discharge one’s own prescribed duties even though they are faulty, than another’s prescribed duties. If one is destroyed in the course of discharging one’s duty, that is also better than being engaged in other duties.” it is, and 

“It is far better to discharge one’s own prescribed duties even though they are faulty, than another’s prescribed duties. If one is destroyed in the course of discharging one’s duty, that is also better than being engaged in other duties.” it will be!!!

Is that very difficult to understand??? It is indeed very difficult to accept for the crooked mind. But everyone else will understand it very easily, because Srila Prabhupada language is simple and easy. So “Where is the difficulty?”

On this day of Srila Prabhupada’s disappearance, I say: “All glories to Srila Prabhupada’s permanent presence with us and all glories to our greatest philosopher, greatest author and greatest guide, in short all glories to Srila Prabhupada the Founder-Acarya of ISKCON and Founder of BBT and BTG! 

Signed:

TKCO or The Krishna Conscious Observer. 

and / or

CANDO, Srila Prabhupada’s very own ferocious Himalayan Mastiff dog.

(two identities, one person) 

 

ONE. In OT BGAII 3.33 Srila Prabhupada indicates:

“Even a learned person acts according to the modes acquired from material nature, and everyone follows his/her own nature. What can artificial suppression accomplish?”

TWO. “Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT” 3.33 by Hayagriva:

“Even a man of knowledge acts according to his own nature, for everyone follows his nature. What can repression accomplish?

And THREE. “Freewheeling Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT” 3.33 by Jayadvaita:

“Even a man of knowledge acts according to his own nature, for everyone follows the nature he has acquired from the three modes. What can repression accomplish?”

Srila Prabhupada definitely uses the word person and we ought to stick to “person.” “Man” cannot be a substituted for “person.” According to Srila Prabhupada the male population is inferior to the female population. So by substituting “man” to “person” you are passing from 100 of the population to perhaps 49 or 48 % of the population, and that’s a huge and unacceptable drop.

Besides that both gender, ladies as well as men, are equally under the influence of the modes of material nature and helplessly obey their dictation.

But much more gravely, by substituting “man” to “person”, we are assuming and publicly stating that women lack the intelligence to become learned and that’s a grave, unforgivable and intolerable affront to the fair sex, which will ultimately lead to exploitation and all sorts of other abuses.

And what about BGAII 10.34?

in construction

I am trying to get in touch with Yogindra Prabhu or Akincana Krishna Prabhu. Can anyone please help? My email address is manduramansw@gmail.com

Here is what my MacBook dictionary gives for the word CLINICAL.

clinical | ˈklɪnɪkl | adjective

1 relating to the observation and treatment of actual patients rather than theoretical or laboratory studies: clinical medicine | clinical drug trials. • (of a disease or condition) causing observable and recognizable symptoms: clinical depression. 

2 very efficient and without feeling; coldly detached: nothing was left to chance—everything was clinical. • (of a room or building) bare, functional, and clean: the room was white and clinical. ORIGIN late 18th century: from Greek klinikē ‘bedside’ (see clinic) + -al.

And in the design of its Founder-Acarya, His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada, ISKCON temples are meant to be the “clinics”, where the medicine of

Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare

Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare

and the diet of Krishna prasadam (sanctified food ) are administered for the best healing chances of all patients.

This can also be done anywhere else indeed, provided the participants have proper Krishna conscious information as to the processes to follow. Best is the get proper information from Srila Prabhupada Himself in his His books or from His representatives, whom He has thoroughly trained over the years.

Bhagavad Gita As It Is 1.36 purport:

According to Vedic injunctions there are six kinds of aggressors: (1) a poison giver, (2) one who sets fire to the house, (3) one who attacks with deadly weapons, (4) one who plunders riches, (5) one who occupies another’s land, and (6) one who kidnaps a wife. Such aggressors are at once to be killed, and no sin is incurred by killing such aggressors. Such killing of aggressors is quite befitting any ordinary man…….

It is not that all priests are bad but there seem to be an evil sub-class of priests who will not stop at any lies or any tactics whatsoever to subdue and control people. Jayadvaita and his protectors, supporters and followers belong to that class. Please beware. In their lust for power, they wage a secret war of revenge against the happy and successful people. Their kind probably invented the death of Lord Jesus Christ on the cross as well and the rest of the sales pitch. They have been around for long time and will not die out in the future. Nothing new under the sun.

Srila Prabhupada’s OT BGAII 3.27:

“The bewildered spirit soul, under the influence of the three modes of material nature, thinks himself as the doer of activities, which are done by nature. “

Hayagriva’s rendition, with some well-meant improvements, is closest to Srila Prabhupada OT as follows:

“The bewildered spirit soul, under the influence of the three modes of material nature, thinks himself to be the doer of activities, which are in actuality carried out by nature. “

But the false Jayadvaita sees the necessity to introduce the concept of false ego into the verse itself in opposition to Srila Prabhupada Himself. Here Jayadvaita deserves another kick of boot in the face for that rebellious action.

Smart-arse Jayadvaita writes:

“The spirit soul bewildered by the influence of false ego thinks himself the doer of activities that are in actuality carried out by the three modes of material nature.”

If we ever needed proof that Hayagriva’s version is the better one of the two versions THIS IS IT!!!

Sri Krishna Himself mentions false ego in the verse “ahankara-vimudhatama”,

Srila Prabhupada mentions it in the word-for-word rendition and as much as three times in the purport as well, but He tactfully refrains to mention it in the verse itself.

The concept of false ego can be quite a manipulative concept and in the wrong hands such as Jayadvaita’s, it acts like poison. Therefore I am calling him a poison giver and Bhagavad Gita As Is 1.36 clearly instructs us how to handle poison givers and other aggressors.

In BGAII 3.28 the same thing happens again. But his time both editors are culprits. Hayagriva initiates the unwanted changes and Jayadvaita rubber-stamps them. Two wrongs do not equal one right.

Prabhupada OT 3.28:

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the matter of the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the difference between work in Krishna consciousness, and work in material consciousness.”

Hayagriva 3.28

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the differences between work in devotion and work for fruitive results.

Jayadvaita 3.28

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the differences between work in devotion and work for fruitive results.

For once the two renditions coincide exactly.

However we may point out two defects:

One. To just juggle away the expression “Krishna consciousness” when Srila Prabhupada personally put it there, is nothing less but demoniac because it represents a significant drop of Krishna consciousness in the text and consequently for the readers as well. It’s just like when you withdraw $10 000 from your bank account. The balance will be reduced by $10 000, a significant amount. At the extremities of the consciousness evolution there are only two consciousnesses. On one side we find the purest Krishna consciousness and on the far opposite side we find the darkest demoniac or material consciousness. Moving away from one consciousness entails automatically moving toward the opposite consciousness. There is no neutral or rest stage. But there are billions of shade of consciousnesses in-between the two extremes and the modes of material nature assure the different tinges of consciousnesses just like a tinter assures the outcome in a colour mix with a particular colour outcome in mind. Things are always in motion and we better watch carefully which way we are being carried or which way we travel. Are we travelling up the evolution scale or are we travelling down the evolution scale? This constant motion and struggle for supremacy is confirmed in Bhagavad Gita AS It Is 14.10 version 3:

“Sometimes the mode of passion becomes prominent, defeating the mode of goodness, O son of Bharata, and sometimes the mode of goodness defeats passion, and again the mode of ignorance defeats goodness and passion. In this way, there is ever a competition for supremacy.”

To just juggle away the expression “Krishna consciousness”, when Srila Prabhupada personally put it there is certainly not the action of a pure devotee of Krishna.

Two. What is the need to replace Srila Prabhupada’s “work in material consciousness” with “work for frutive results. Anyone ???? The answer will be there is absolutely no need whatsoever to touch Srila Prabhupada’s rendition and it will be version 3 for BGAII 3.28.

We note that in His literary grace, His Divine Grace produces a very nice and elegant parallel of “the difference between work in Krishna consciousness, and work in material consciousness.”

AND THOSE FARMERS OR VAISYAS WHO HAVE NO SENSE FOR SUCH LITERARY EMBELLISHMENTS WILL DO WELL TO STAY A AWAY FROM EDITING THE ACHARYAS’ RENDITIONS OR ELSE GET THEIR FINGERS BURNED.

Now here I have to open a side line because I discovered another Jayadvaita idiosyncrasy while checking BGAII 14.10.

If I insult him as many times as he insults Srila Prabhupada I have a very long way to go.

The explanation lies in BGAII 14.10:

Srila Prabhupada OT BGAII 14.10:

“Sometimes the mode of passion becomes prominent, defeating the mode of goodness, O son of Bharata, and sometimes the mode of goodness defeats passion, and again the mode of ignorance defeats goodness and passion. In this way, there is ever a competition for supremacy.”

For BGAII 14.10, the wise Hayagriva renders: 

Sometimes the mode of passion becomes prominent, defeating the mode of goodness, O son of Bharata. And sometimes the mode of goodness defeats passion, and at other times the mode of ignorance defeats goodness and passion. In this way there is always competition for supremacy.

Srila Prabhupada’s OT rendition for BGAII 14.10 basically does not need any alterations or improvements whatsoever. It is just perfect. But Hayagriva’s alterations, although unnecessary, are basically inoffensive because he respects the basic structure of the two sentences of which 14.10 is made off.

Now comes smart arse Jayadvaita who knows better than anyone else as always. He basically sounds like a primary school student who has just proudly discovered that one plus one equals two. What a child.

Here is what he writes and everyone- including the GBC of ISKCON- misguidedly pays their obeisances to this childish IDIOT. ” O very good, very good Jayadvaita is such an advanced pure devotee!” What a farce!

“Sometimes the mode of goodness becomes prominent, defeating the modes of passion and ignorance, O son of Bharata. Sometimes the mode of passion defeats goodness and ignorance, and at other times ignorance defeats goodness and passion. In this way there is always competition for supremacy.

He talks like primary student who has just realised that one plus one equals two and proudly displays his small knowledge, impudently correcting his teacher. and his co-editor as well. Smart-arse Jayadavaita just about always knows better than everyone else, proudly display his so-called knowledge and breaks all rules of etiquette.

On this super-puffed up, super-egotistical rendition, I really can’t comment any more than he needs to learn to respect the World Acharya NOW, His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada and all other Acharyas as well by the way.

Please always chant 

Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare

Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare

and thus make your life perfect.