JAYADVAITA IS A CHEATER AND A TRAITOR. HE HAD ABSOLUTELY NO MANDATE FOR WHAT HE HAS DONE. HE CUNNINGLY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF SRILA PRABHUPADA’S AND THE COMMUNITY OF DEVOTEES’ TRUST BESTOWED UPON HIM TO PUSH HIS OWN PRIVATE AGENDA. HIS CIVIL NAME IS “JAY ISRAEL.”What more needs to be said? AND THOSE WHO SUPPORT HIM IN ANY WAY ARE OF THE SAME PERNICIOUS NATURE. BESIDES THAT HE IS MORALLY CORRUPT (BGAII 16.7). This smart ass also thinks he is the smartest of us all. He definitely needs to be taught a lesson. His actions will not attract sympathy for his cause. They will only attract condemnation. Wrong move boy! Underhand cheaters and traitors get no shelter in any community. They are hunted down like masterless dogs, with their tail low between their legs and ALWAYS filled with anxiety and fear ABOUT WHAT COMES NEXT, a hellish mentality indeed.

Posted on December 9, 2024 by ajm108

AND THE APOGEE OF THIS FELLOW’S ARROGANCE AND SIMULTANEOUS STUPIDITY IS THAT HE THINKS HE IS SMARTER THAT SRILA PRABHUPADA HIMSELF. HE ACTUALLY DOES NOT HAVE A HIGH OPINION AT ALL OF HIS GURU’S TALENTS. WHAT A LOW LIFE!!! THIS MENTALITY OOZES FROM EACH CORRECTION HE DARED TO IMPOSE IMPUDENTLY ON SRILA PRABHUPADA’S ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT (OT). THAT ALONE DESERVES A SECOND OR PERHAPS a whole round of BOOT KICKS IN HIS FACE.

“Apaisunam means that one should not find fault with others or correct them unnecessarily. Of course to call a thief a thief is not faultfinding, but to call an honest person a thief is very much offensive for one who is making advancement in spiritual life.”

SO FAR I HAVE NOT FOUND A PERSON SMARTER, WISER, more Sanskrit and Shastra educated, AND MORE REASONABLE and benevolent THAN SRILA PRABHUPADA. THAT WOULD HAVE TO APPLY IN ALL SPHERES OF LIFE, NOT JUST TO Srila Prabhupada’s SPECIALITY, WHICH IS SELF REALIZATION. SRILA PRABHUPADA IS TRULY NARASHRESTHA, THE BEST AMONG PEOPLE. AND JAYADVAITA IS A PUFFED UP FOOL AND discretion-less and discrimination-less IMBECILE. He is a fanatic too for sacrificing his spiritual interest to his worldly goals, typically the person who will cause religious wars, because he uses spirituality for advancement of worldly goals. Srimad Bhagavatam completely rejects him and such attitude and mentality.

His so far successful agenda is to transform a philosophical treatise into a crowd and sense gratifier pleasing, smooth sounding, suave commercial manual with many nonsensical contradictions. But hey, who will notice the contradictions? Who has the education and the time to notice the philosophical contradictions? I do!

In any case, Jayadvaita’s Bhagavad Gita As It Is NOT is a-parampara. That should settle the matter and make the devotee community thinks how they wish to be situated. Do they wish to be situated in the parampara line or outside parampara? The answer is obvious. So are consequent actions to be taken. I am happy to debate this matter with qualified individuals.

Ref. VedaBase => Bg 16.1, Bg 16.2, Bg 16.3, Bg 16.1–3




		
	
											


		
						

							This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.													

					


				

				
			




	

		
Leave a comment