So altogether an impersonalist, a coward, a monist, a usurper and kidnapper, traitor, a parasite, a cunning subverter, and pretender, a small minded sectarian and above all, philosophically speaking, a FOOL, a boorish farmer, And now an apasampradaya FOOL or straying fool. All glories to Jayadvaita, the shady one, who cultivates his own type of non enviable glory!


Wikipedia writes “He has been described as “one of ISKCON’s most independent-minded and respected thinkers.” WHAT A JOKE!!! THERE MUST BE SOME kind of UNCLEAN UNDERBOARD, as apposed to above board, relationship going on here! Proven again: wherever and whenever Jayadavaita turns up the picture gets muddy!

This is not fact reporting as per the mission statement of Wikipedia. This is active and biased promotion and advertising for an ISKCON stray Swami and I am now starting to doubt Wikipedia’s objectivity. We have donated twice to Wikipedia because we were in awe for Wikipedias super-extensive, fast, up date and accurate reporting. This needs to be reconsidered now. A devotee sees everything in relationship with Krishna. If the check out lady at a Brisbane, Queensland the supermarket is called Vishakha from Bangladesh, then he can every easily remember this beautiful name and checks out exactly what is the relationship of Vishakha and Srimatee Radharani Herself. There are even males who are called Vishakha as confirmed in SB 6.6.14:

From Krttika, another wife of Agni, came the son named Skanda, Karttikeya, whose sons were headed by Visakha. From the womb of Sarvari, the wife of the Vasu named Dosa, came the son named Sisumara, who was an expansion of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

But here in Srimad Bhagavatam 10.32.8 purport by His Divine Grace Hridayanada Das Goswami of Los Angeles we find the relevant information:

“Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura states that the seven gopis mentioned so far in this chapter are the first seven of the eight principal gopis, whose status allowed them to immediately approach Sri Krsna upon His reappearance. The acarya quotes a verse from the Sri Vaisnava-tosani that gives tehe names of these seven as Candravali, Syamala, Saibya, Padma, Sri Radha, Lalita and Visakha. The eighth is understood to be Bhadra. Sri Vaisnava-tosani itself quotes a verse from the Skanda Purana that declares these eight gopis to be the principal among the three billion gopis. Detailed information about the hierarchy of gopis is available in Srila Rupa Gosvami’s Ujjvala-nilamani.”

When however a respected entity such as Wikipedia falsely reports about and glorifies an ISKCON stray Swami, then here is cause for concern.

Jayadvaita and his followers are heading to hell, THEY ARE ON THE WAY TO HELL, because of Jayadvaita SUPER OFFENSIVENESS TO HIS GURU, HIS DIVINE GRACE A.C. BHAKTIVEDANTA SWAMI PRABHUPADA, the founder of the International Hare Krishna movement.

Why doesn’t Wikipedia publish the following pseudo-eulogy for Jayadvaita instead:

So altogether an impersonalist, a coward, a monist, an usurper, traitor, a parasite, a cunning subverter, and pretender, a small minded sectarian and above all, philosophically speaking, a FOOL. And now an apasampradaya FOOL or straying fool. All glories to Jayadvaita, who cultivates his own type of non enviable glory!

In BGAII 3.28 the same thing happens again. But his time both editors are culprits. Hayagriva initiates the unwanted changes and Jayadvaita rubber-stamps them. Two wrongs do not equal one right.

Prabhupada OT 3.28:

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the matter of the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the difference between work in Krishna consciousness, and work in material consciousness.”

Hayagriva 3.28

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the differences between work in devotion and work for fruitive results.

Jayadvaita 3.28

“One who is in knowledge of the Absolute Truth, O mighty-armed, does not engage himself in the senses and sense gratification, knowing well the differences between work in devotion and work for fruitive results.

For once the two renditions coincide exactly.

However we may point out two defects:

One. To just juggle away the expression “Krishna consciousness” when Srila Prabhupada personally put it there, is nothing less but demoniac because it represents a significant drop of Krishna consciousness in the text and consequently for the readers as well. It’s just like when you withdraw $10 000 from your bank account. The balance will be reduced by $10 000, a significant amount. There are only two consciousnesses. On one side there is Krishna consciousness and on the far opposite side we find the darkest demoniac or material consciousness. Moving away from one consciousness means moving toward the opposite consciousness. There is no neutral or rest stage. Things are always in motion and we better watch carefully which way awe are being carried.

To just juggle away the expression “Krishna consciousness”, when Srila Prabhupada personally put it there is certainly not the action of a pure devotee of Krishna.

Two. What is the need to replace Srila Prabhupada’s “work in material consciousness” with “work for fruitive results. Anyone ???? The answer will be there is absolutely no need to replace Srila Prabhupada rendition and it will be version 3 for BGAII 3.28.

Please always chant 

Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare

Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare

and thus make your life perfect.